Inpatient trunk exercises after recent stroke: an update meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Publication

Domain

Fellow

NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 369-377, 2019

Daniele Costa Borges Souza PT^a,b; Matheus de Sales Santos^b,c; Nildo Manoel da Silva Ribeiro PT, PhD^b,c,d,e; Igor Lima Maldonado BMath, MD, PhD^a,b,f-i

^aPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina e Saúde, Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia, Universidade Federal da Bahia;

^bDivisão de Neurologia e Epidemiologia, Complexo Hospitalar Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Universidade Federal da Bahia;

^cPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Processos Interativos dos Órgãos e Sistemas, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia

^dDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia;

^eUnidade de Reabilitação, Complexo Hospitalar Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Universidade Federal da Bahia;

^fUnidade Neuro-Músculo-Esquelética, Complexo Hospitalar Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Universidade Federal da Bahia.

^gDepartamento de Biomorfologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia.

^hLE STUDIUM Loire Valley Institute for Advanced Studies, Orléans, France

ⁱUMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:Although the role of trunk exercises in the chronic phase of stroke is acknowledged, the addition of specific inpatient training in the subacute stage is a matter of debate and varies among centers. Recent new evidence suggests the question should be revisited. OBJECTIVE:To assess the impact of the addition of specific trunk training to inpatient rehabilitation protocols after a recent stroke. METHODS:A systematic review was performed assessing the impact of inpatient trunk training. The search was performed in LILACS, SciELO, PEDro, Cochrane, and NCBI PubMed databases for clinical trials published up to December 31st, 2017. The initial bibliographic research identified 3202 articles. After analyzing the titles, 19 abstracts were selected for detailed analysis. After application of the eligibility criteria, the final selection included nine studies. Outcome measurements from the same evaluation instruments were submitted to a meta-analysis to improve homogeneity (7 studies). RESULTS:All patients in the included studies were recruited less than three months after a stroke. Seven studies assessed trunk control using the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS). There was a significant improvement in trunk control with a pooled increase in TIS score of 3.3 points from the baseline (CI95:2.54–4.06, p < 0.0001). Three studies assessed balance using the Brunel Balance Assessment (BBA) scale. There was also a significant improvement in balance with a pooled increase in BBA score of 2.7 points (CI95:1.5–4.03, p < 0.0001). The Berg Balance Scale was used for balance assessment in three studies. The meta-analysis of their results showed a pooled increase of 13.2 points (CI95:9.49–16.84, p < 0.0001). Weight transfer was evaluated in four studies using different methods. The addition of inpatient trunk exercises was associated with an improvement in the ability to transfer the trunk laterally in three studies. CONCLUSION:The introduction of trunk-based inpatient training protocols brings short-term benefits in trunk performance and balance in stroke patients.

Keywords

Stroke

Neurological rehabilitation

Postural balance

Exercise therapy

Published by

IOS press